
You are still in love with Yasmina. You have always known it, but sometimes forget. You last saw her in the July of 1976. That’s forty-seven years ago and, since you are approaching old age now, it’s possible she is no longer of this world. They say we know, when a distant loved one has departed for the next life, but that’s only if they have ever thought of you, and she never did. Indeed, I doubt she even knew your name. Sometimes love is like that.
It was the most beautiful, yet also the most painful thing you have known. It was also the most formative, in that it made you what you are. Which is what? What are you, my friend? Will I tell you? You lack confidence in the world, or you would not have withdrawn from it as early as you did. You are isolated in your feelings, feeling always the strangeness of yourself, and your thoughts. And that she did not know you, never asked your name, has also lent the world this air of a thing made of glass. It is transparent to you, but has an impermeable surface, which puts you always on the outside of it. Or so it feels on days like these, when the rain beats against the window, and nothing amuses you. Not reading, not writing, nor the role-call of old acquaintances – those still living, that is. So many names now remain pencilled, but with lights gone out, yet you cannot erase them, as you cannot erase Yasmina.
You were fourteen, fifteen, sixteen years old, and have never felt anything so powerful. There have been women since, though few. There have even been nights of passion but, again, few. And every emotion you have felt, pales beside what you felt for her, both in the pain and the glory of it. She was, is, and always will be the standard by which you judge all things. Indeed, your whole life has been a quest for the source of what you felt in her. For though you love her, you are wise enough to know she was but the channel of a source beyond imagining. During those all too brief years, it took human form in Yasmina, for it was in her alone you might have recognised it for the divinity it was.
You cannot believe there is no purpose in such a love as that. Granted, such refusal may arise from a fear belief is delusional in a world void of meaning. And all rational evidence suggests the meaning of life is much less than we would like it to be. What is the meaning of a life, then? Any life. Will we ask it of the computer?
Hey Noodle, what do you say is the meaning of life?
Meaning, replies Noodle,β¦ hmm, that’s a deep one, for the machine is programmed to simulate character, and humour. It then quotes us Simone De Bouvoir. It was she who said life only has meaning in so far as we value the lives of others. That’s about the best the Existentialists will allow. A gloomy bunch to be sure, best suited to violent times, not times of capitulation and crushing despair such as these. But they don’t ring true for you, and why? You have valued Yasmina above all others, and felt only her indifference. You have sought the surrogate of her love in others, and they all failed you, and only because they were not Yasmina. What then is the meaning, if the reward for so valuing others, is to be rejected by them?
Let us ask the computer again.
To exist, says Noodle, means to have a way of living. The computer’s way of living is to search, so the meaning of life, according to Noodle, is to search and to learn. Which all sounds rather dry. Plus, there are two problems with it. One, the computer is not alive, and second, there is nothing to say its way of being – as it describes – is the same as yours. But let us be generous and say we are all on the path of learning, and searching. And for sure, you have sought and learned much. But you have never shared your knowledge, always assuming the world to be indifferent to such learning, as gleaned by outsiders, like you. You therefore keep your own counsel, though your better instinct is to share.
Your purpose then, according to Noodle’s logic, is to exist in secret, and in isolation, but only in so far as you see yourself. In relation to others, you have no existence at all. So be it, but you still love Yasmina. And, strange though it may seem, therein also lies, if not your life’s purpose, then the seedling from which all else grew.
Now, from this perspective, turn your eyes away from the rain, and the despair of the times, pick up your pen, and write.
βFor though you love her, you are wise enough to know she was but the channel of a source beyond imagining.β
All praise be to the one and only source, that beckons us home; tirelessly, patiently, creatively and above all lovingly. Never out of reach from its invisible guiding hands, its gently whispered encouragements and endless intercessions disguised as good luck or good fortune.
Thank you so much for your thoughts on this. It was an experimental opening chapter, not sure where it would lead, if anywhere, but it seems to be developing momentum. Best wishes.
Between love and moksha in the times of cyber crimes.
I think you’ve managed to encapsulate in that one line what it would have taken me a whole novel to grope towards, Narayan. Beautiful.
Since you are in a meditative mood, there is an ancient Irish saying: “There are 3 candles that illumine every darkness: truth, nature and knowledge.” π
Thanks, Ashley, that’s a good one. I shall remember it.
It sounds like the opening to an interesting novel, but one about someone who’s delusional. Does he eventually realise you can’t actually love someone you don’t know?
Ah. Wow. Actually, no, I don’t think he does. Or he mistakes what he feels for human love. It is indeed the opening of a possible novel, or maybe just ironing out the remaining wrinkles of my own psyche. Same thing. Thanks.
Wow. Beautiful writing. I hope you continue.
And I think it’s possible to love someone you “don’t know.” I think it happens all the time in marriages, lol. You know? You only come to know someone fully after maybe 20, 30 years. So what was that earlier love about? It was partly an illusion based only on pieces of a puzzle that gradually gets resolved with time. π
Thank you, Stacy. Yes, I think that’s a wonderful description of a marriage. We really can’t know the person we fall in love with, so the connection must be a thing we project from within to begin with – almost a fantasy or an idealisation- and it’s only over time we gradually come to know the real person.
π