“The arts put man at the centre of the universe, whether he belongs there or not. Military science, on the other hand, treats man as garbage – and his children, and his cities, too. Military science is probably right about the contemptibility of man in the vastness of the universe. Still – I deny that contemptibility, and I beg you to deny it, through the creation of appreciation of art.”
Kurt Vonnegut -1970
Unless you’re already some sort of celebrity, it’s a well established fact the arts are no way to make a living. But what they do for the ordinary Joe and Joanna, is make living meaningful, or even just bearable. It brings each of us back to the centre of our universe. It may be there is nothing to life and death, nor anything beyond it, and all our stories to the contrary are wishful thinking. But the person who takes up a pen, writes a story, or a poem, paints a picture, sings in a choir, dances, performs in amateur dramatics, or even – as Vonnegut once also put it – makes a face in their mashed potato, performs an act of defiance. If there’s art, creativity, inside of you, you have to let it out. Do not deny you have a soul, or the soul will become a demon, and it will eat you.
Trying to write for money nearly killed my desire to write in the first place. It’s likely there’s a good reason my novels never tickled an editor’s fancy, but an inability to court the art-world or write like a Hemingway or a Vonnegut is no reason not to write. My novels have taught me, and shaped me in ways that would not have happened if I’d spent every night in the pub, or watching trash TV. I dabble in watercolours too. I’m no good at it, and can only marvel at the masters, but I do enjoy working with colour. Poetry, comes and goes. Photography is more constant. I spent a good bit of yesterday setting up a shot of a watering can and a garden fork, then waiting for the sky to turn interesting. I don’t know why. Art can use technology, too. It all depends on how you use it. The picture isn’t going to win any competitions, but it’s what I saw and felt, what I was looking for, and what I was trying to express that’s the important thing. And I don’t always have words for that. Nor does it have to please anyone else.
I mention this to illustrate how when we get stuck with one form of expression, we simply turn to another. There’s an endless list of creative means. I’ve just adopted the ones that appeal to me. Thus, we cycle. If we’re not performing for money, it doesn’t matter. The work gets done, effortlessly, and the work is about you. It’s about building you by whatever means come to hand.
I enjoy reading blogs. But the blogs I follow are of a particular sort. They’re not selling anything, and are written by people with no agenda, other than to give vent to their creative energies. And what interesting personalities they are, each of them worthy of a glossy, hard-backed biography on the shelves in Waterstones, and these individual perspectives have shaped me too. But, other than through the semi-anonymity of the blogging medium, these authors have discovered the secret of contentment in being unknown. They do it because they enjoy it, and seek no explanation for it. But they’re growing their souls, and mine, all the same. They are, to quote Kurt Vonnegut again, “becoming”.
I remember an old trades union leader telling of looking up at a monolithic block of Brutlaist flats. To others, it would have presented a grey, depressing vision of “the masses”. But behind any one of those hundreds, or thousands of little windows, he said, was a potential philosopher, mathematician, writer, actor, social activist, or an inspirational leader, and to deny them the opportunity of “becoming” is the tragedy of a regressive society. To treat people as contemptible, as trash, is to diminish all people, everywhere.
I like the way Vonnegut put it in that opening quote. Yes, maybe the materialists are right, there’s no soul, no purpose, consciousness is an illusion, and we’re all just robots made of meat. Who am I to deny it? Yet, I deny it anyway. The soul is a work in progress. The tools we use are the whole panoply of creative expression. And if you don’t feel yourself to be naturally creative, you can always feed upon the art of others. Read. Look at pictures. Watch a play. Listen to music. But try not to fall for what is shallow – you can usually identify it by the fact its purpose is more to empty your pockets for little return, or to make you hate. Try to go deeper, into the sublime, and feel it. And what you will feel there, that is the only reality. Yes, there is certainly a world, a universe, without a soul, where we can erase all feelings with a pill, but it’s one we’ve created. I never said we were perfect, and perhaps it’s integral to the human condition that when it comes to the journey of the soul, we will always have a long way to go. So be creative for its own sake. Every day. It’s good for you. And it’s good for everyone else.
This is such a good post, Michael. And I love the photo too. I would really like to reblog it, if that’s okay with you.
Thank you, Audrey. Of course, by all means, reblog, and welcome. I’m so glad you liked it.
Great! I will post the reblog later today.
An excellent piece! I was creative in my late teens even going to art college and wanted to continue but was turned down! That was in the 60s-70s and earning a living overtook things. It is really only since retirement 7 years ago that the creative drive has returned and even then it has been uphill as I try to understand what it is I really want to do, and get rid of clutter! I remember watching a TV programme about primative art in which Antony Gormley (Sir!) tried to understand what drove those ancient individuals to paint. You raise similar questions here and without complete answers there is really only one thing to do and that is to keep writing, painting or whatever it is that stretches the imagination, and broadensthe horizon! (I don’t think I’ve put all of that very well! Sorry!)
Thank you, Ashely. I thought you put it very well. My own teens and twenties were devoted to engineering studies, but the art side, particularly writing, always provided a balance and had to be pretty much self-taught. We stretch the imagination and broaden the horizon, as you say, but not always in tangible ways. It also adds depth.
“looking up at a monolithic block of Brutlaist flats. To others, it would have presented a grey, depressing vision of “the masses”. But behind any one of those hundreds, or thousands of little windows, he said, was a potential philosopher, mathematician, writer, actor, social activist, or an inspirational leader”
I like this, it’s the way I try to look at cities, I think it’s something you struggle with more Michael. You can use it with people too, just because someone is a c### today, it doesn’t mean they were that yesterday, or will be tomorrow. We each of us have countless opportunities to perform, and most of us realise our potential at some point.
But all the same there has to be a limit, how many artists, geniuses, …can the world cope with? !
Last weekend I went briefly to my boat to varnish, I enjoyed the trip, but I was stalked by death. A rabbit had chosen to die right beside my boat, and I saw two hedgehogs side by side beside the road on the way home, I’ve not noticed that before. My wife refuses to eat the chard that grows in the boatyard as she thinks it contaminated, I wonder if I was somehow responsible for rabbit’s demise.
I sense your ego has fallen a little flat since retirement, perhaps that is healthy, but rest assured, if you had ever been marketed you would be up there with the worst of the celebrities as your books would have sold like hot cakes!
It’s just the case that you never, really, played the game!
I think you may be right, such as my ego was. I remember getting quite vexed over political matters, once, but would nowadays rather stare at the clouds, and trust your judgement that it’s probably for the best.
I’m not sure my novels would have been rescued by marketing, but it would certainly have ruined my life if they had propelled me into the realms of dubious celebrity. I would not have known what to say, off the cuff, which is something celebrities never seem stuck for.
Reblogged this on Audrey Driscoll's Blog and commented:
Here is an inspiring post from writer, photographer, and observer of nature, Michael Graeme. His blog is always worth a visit!
Leave comments on the original post, please.
This was such a refreshing post, and I think you for it!
Argh, fumble fingers! *thank
Thank you, Liz. I knew what you meant. Much appreciated.
Excellent post. I’m one of those bloggers that does it for the satisfaction and not the fame or profit
Here’s to the likes of us.👍👍👍😉😎
I shall raise a glass to that. Thank you!
An inspiring post indeed, Michael. Thanks for writing it, and to Audrey for sharing it.
Thank you, Cynthia. Much appreciated. And to Audrey for re-posting it.
I’ve come to your blog by way of Audrey Driscoll’s. I agree with her, this is an inspiring post – a hymn to the power of creative expression to lift the human spirit – both for the creator and for those witnessing it.
Thank you, Suzanne. Much appreciated.
And thank you also for the follow!
I love the image that accompanies this post – so worth your time spent setting it up and waiting for the sky to turn interesting. I agree with your view of creativity for its own sake – not for fame or fortune. I write short nonfiction and, while it would be nice for my words to be read and enjoyed by others, I do it for my own satisfaction.
Thank you. Much appreciated.
Hello Michael.
I also came to your post via Audrey’s blog.
Just to let you thank you for these words. Being a writer who will remain forever unknown, but stubborn with it, it was a joy to read your commentary, I can now now add Dignity to my stubborn streak as a cause to keep on keeping on.
Best wishes
Roger
Thank you. If in some small way, I managed to stiffen your resolve, I consider that a job well done. Best wishes, Roger.
Well done indeed Michael👍
Reblogged this on NEW BLOG HERE >> https:/BOOKS.ESLARN-NET.DE.
Kurt is always worth listening to.
One must realize the tautology of it all, however. To deny the Absurdity of the Universe is to affirm humanity’s place as stewards of meaning and purpose. For to accept the Absurdity would mean to reject all meaning, thereby negating our ability to reject in the first place.
I believe in the Futility of Existence, the “we are bags of animated chemicals,” yet, cannot shake off the legacy of my DNA’s directive. Also, I like beer and stinky cheese.
Hi Anonymole. Great fan of Kurt. I’m a wine and spirits man myself but stinky cheese,… Oh yes. 👍🙂
I read this, and your entry on why you publish your novels for free with interest. I’ve been doing the same thing for the same reason for the last seven years. You can write what you want and never have to ask yourself, “Will it sell?” Though it has gotten harder to find an audience for even free books these last few years, but it still beats work.
Hi there, and thanks for dropping by. Always good to find a fellow indy who gives his books away, and gets my own reasons for doing so. I put all my novels out through Smashwords, and I agree, things do seem to have slowed down in recent years – though Smashwords was never that great for downloads in the first place.
It was interesting to read a piece on your site that talked about readers homing in on specific genres nowadays, even for free books, and which might explain it. That’s a pity because one of the other things about self-publishing I like is that you’re not trapped by genres. Looks like the publishers were right on that one, though. Good to hear from you.
I think in part it is the medium. Ebooks, at least the self published ones, seem to serve the very avid readers who once upon a time read the pulps, magazines and the mass market paperbacks for the various types of stories they offered. Of course not every reader of ebooks fall into that category, but when you spread the rest out over several million books…
I write adventure stories that I can slot in as science fiction or fantasy, so I have a one of the more popular genres to ride the shirttails of, which helps.
Now I am going to see how AI narrated audiobooks will do for free.
I’m reading Saving Grace now and enjoying it. Thanks!
That’s a good point about the pulps. I’ve not thought about it that way before, but that feels right. Thanks for picking up Saving Grace. I had a lot of fun writing that one. I hope it doesn’t disappoint. Much appreciated.
Thanks, Michael, for sharing your sense of the importance of creativity to all of us in life. The distinction you make between TV trash and efforts at creativity reminded me of a distinction Eric Fromm makes in ‘The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness’, where he defines two types of stimuli (page 269):
‘What is usually overlooked is the fact that there is a different kind of stimulus, one that stimulates the person to be active. Such an activating stimulus could be a novel, a poem, an idea, a landscape, music, or a loved person. . . . .
‘The simple stimulus produces a drive – i.e., the person is driven by it; the activating stimulus results in a striving – i.e., the person is actively striving for a goal.’
Thank you, Pete. I’m not familiar at all with Fromm, but shall look him up. The TV trash – also social media, click-bait and so on are certainly compulsive – but in ways I feel shut the mind down, or gum it up with matter that lacks nourishment – if that doesn’t sound too obvious. Creative works, even of the most idiosyncratic kind – open it up to an exploration of the world and to fresh insights.