In spite of the ongoing pandemic, there are local elections taking place in various areas on May 6th. For anyone on the left, politics can seem like something of a lost cause these days. There is the hope we still have a shout in the locals though, and the Party cheerleaders, and their friends at the Guardian this week, are certainly keeping their peckers up in that respect. Locally though, we’re a little more realistic and expect a drubbing.
Once in a blue moon, I drop leaflets for the local constituency Labour Party. It’s a mystery how I’ve ended up doing this. My son was (briefly) a party member, so it’s his job really, but he resigned in dismay, post 2019, post Corbyn. And what with Bad Boy Boris still sailing high in the polls, on the strength of 130,000 dead, he’s lost faith in the topsy-turvy world of politics, and that anything can ever change for the better. That said, we managed to squeak our guy into the borough council chamber last time, which meant a Labour majority. But now the boundaries have been changed to include a larger swathe of blue, and he’s not so hopeful of being re-elected. When he accosted me over the garden hedge, sounding me out about the leaflets again, I got the impression we were just going through the motions, but he’s a nice guy, and I have the time, and why not?
So I’ve been out in the spring sunshine, wandering up garden paths with all the confidence of a man on official business. There are about a hundred properties, some of them remote. The boss-class Jags and Beamers on the driveways confirm this is not your natural Labour heartland, but I don’t want the Blues thinking they’ve a clear run. And one never knows.
Letter boxes are interesting things, at least they are if you’re in a philosophical frame of mind. Those up-tight double flapped draught excluder ones (like the one I have) are the worst. They scrunch up your neatly folded leaflets and trap them somewhere between the inside and the outside. Postmen must really hate them. And if you try to shove your hand through to lift the inner flap and get your stuff through cleanly, they’ll trap your fingers, if you’ve rings on them.
Then there are the old-fashioned easy lift-up type with the busted return springs – the type that rattle and squeak a bit in the wind. They’re the best, suggestive of a relaxed household, one that’s garden gnomey, with a cosy cat curled up somewhere. Your leaflets just sail through those. Then there are the posh mail-boxes that stand like sentries, keeping you at a distance from the door.
Long, scrunchy gravel driveways, electric gates, electric fences, keep out signs, beware of the dog signs, and the plethora of security cameras that protect wealthy egos, they’re all intimidating, but I’m on official business. I’m representing your local councillor, so I shall pass!
After the rout of the general election in 2019, we’ve entered a strangely post-political era, Orwellian in many ways, post truth, post fact, and with a media either powerfully in support of the incumbent, or shamelessly supine in not calling out even their most egregious transgressions. The left too, is in a pretty hopeless state, something self-neutering about it. On the plus side, I’m impressed by the various independent media – Novara, Double Down News, Byline Times, but they’re preaching to the converted and I don’t see them getting much traction in the main-stream. My own position these days, while still left leaning, has somewhat transcended the fray.
I’m working on the assumption the coming years will be turbulent as Brexit bites, and the Union disintegrates. There’s also the chance of a return to sectarian bloodshed in Ireland, and for which History will judge the British harshly, unless, as seems likely, History will be abolished, unless it can be proven to be Patriotic. Meanwhile, the right-authoritarians consolidate their grip even further on hearts and minds, by blaming it all on someone else. Politics is one of the most complicated stories there is, but all we want are simple answers, which is why many of us would sooner get our information from the crass soundbites of Youtube and Facebook pundits, making us all suckers for disinformation and spin.
A handful of leaflets for the locals isn’t going to change any of that. But it gets you round the houses, and it’s nice to see the various ways people make the approaches to their homes homely, or otherwise. Almost everyone I met was pleasant. The two ladies taking morning tea in their sunny front garden were charming, and received my leaflets like they were the most important missives they’d had in weeks. Just the one curmudgeon told me where to shove them. Then there’s the party member, and conference vet. If he sees you out and about, that’s it for an hour on the subject of where the left is going wrong, like I really care any more. He’s talked to this person and that person (drop name here) “at conference”, lets you know he knows infinitely more about politics than you ever will, as he may well do. But I do wonder why he isn’t he taking the leaflets round instead of me.
Anyway, May 6th. Whatever your political stripes, do read those leaflets. I know they’re cringe-worthy and my lot managed to wiggle in a few typos, which will have raised eyebrows among the keener eyed. But they’re the only info you’ll get unless you’re lucky enough to be door-stepped by your local candidates, and they tend only to go for the known floaters. I know, politics is mostly bullshit and name-calling, but votes count. So let’s have your votes.
And now after all that dirty politics talk, I need a bath in something slow, repetitive, and with lots of reverb:
I share your sentiments and am mildly dismayed with the current state of politics (to say the least); not only in the UK but across the world. The far right and libertarian sentiments are in ascendance and the turkeys keep on voting for Christmas.
However, I think maybe I’m just too close to tree to see the forest properly and hope that all is indeed perfect in the grander scheme of things. If the old adage that the world we see is a reflection of ourselves holds true, then perhaps the eyes that are seeing and the heart that is feeling is tainted by misguided desire rather than seeing things as they truly are.
If life’s ultimate purpose is to awaken man to his true nature than nothing brings man closer to the raw reality than a bout of immediate suffering and regret; and perhaps as an allusion to this end that the great sages and seers throughout the ages have repeatedly said that all’s well and everything is unfolding as it should.
Hello there. Thanks. I think that’s true, how we project our own fears onto the world, and we sometimes see what we want, or expect, to see. So maybe things aren’t in as dire a state as they sometimes feel, though I do try to take a balanced view, and whilst not suffering unduly myself, I can see others less fortunate are. Are the less fortunate suffering more or less than they were forty years ago? Hard to say.
I trust the sages are right, and things are unfolding exactly as they should. I do wish so many did not have to get hurt in the process, though I suppose it could be argued that’s the whole point.
All the best, Allotmentwala, and good to hear from you.!
Thank you Michael!
Keep on keeping on. Maybe the youth of your country will bring about a forward-thinking future.
“Do you know that in 1924, a Bankers Association publication suggested ‘By dividing the voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discreet action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished.’
Everything had to be one of two choices, a dichotomy one can see to this day. Republicans and Democrats, Labour and Conservatives, Pro Life and Abortionist. Only the extremes are permitted, what happened to the vast ground in between? Plato in teaching rhetoric called it ‘Argument by excluded middle’.
What about recognising that both extremes have positive and negative aspects? Why not settle in the centre, why not embrace the positive and discard the negative from both, are they truly incompatible? People are conned into having to make a decision. They fight long campaigns, and spend enormous amounts of money, over whether the taxation rate should be 37% or 39%, and everybody has to pick one or the other. ”
“So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.
– Benjamin Disraeli, British Prime Minister.”
(1804-1881)
“There is something behind the Throne greater than the King himself.”
Sir William Pitt (1708-78),
Delivering leaflets is good exercise and cannot do any harm but the whole farce of democracy is designed to stop you getting angry. “Things are wrong? Well you asked for it.”
Jack London (c 1910) describes the perception of “the great mass of the people [who] still persisted in the belief that they ruled the country by virtue of their ballots,” when “in reality, the country was ruled by what were called political machines. At first the machine bosses charged the master capitalists extortionate tolls for legislation; but in a short time the master capitalists found it cheaper to own the political machines themselves and to hire the machine bosses.”
Good guys (Corbyn, Cook et al.) will be destroyed so that the farce can continue.
One does not have to have the answers to know that something is wrong. Even if you have the answers, you have no power to correct the problem and implement the solution.
Whilst you have Labour shadow ministers pushing to close grammar schools as elitist, while sending their children to private schools, Labour is just the same as Conservative, greedy, useless burdens on productive citizens.
“Man will never be free until the last king (politician) is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.”
Denis Diderot
But I do love your columns.
I recall Chompsky referring to the western political system as a plutocracy, and hard to disagree with him – as you say, the electorate being allowed to vote once every four years or so based on arguments over generally inconsequential matters while everything of substance remains the same.
I think at the local level, if you know your candidate for the council, you have some idea how they’ll use their influence over matters of local vexation – planning, flood-relief, litter and so on. But at the national level there’s a lot of truth in the saying it matters not who you vote for, the government always get in.
Thanks for reading!
I’m getting behind with my reading.
Nobody has come posting leaflets let alone presenting themselves on the doorstep as in past years, and I don’t have a vicious dog. This emphasises the distancing of politicians from the general population ie Me.
Anyhow, I have a postal vote and it is already in. In local elections I tend to favour the Green Party hoping at a local level their environmental policies may influence our planners and road authorities.
We shall see.
I wasn’t sure we had a green candidate, but I’ve just looked it up and it’s a guy called John Clare, like the poet. That could be a sign.
Go for it!
I’m tempted by your sound reasoning and feel myself wavering, but don’t dob me in to the reds. 👍😊