The online world remains the easiest outlet for creative expression, at least one that comes with an audience. I’d say it was my “preferred” option but that would be to suggest I have any other choice which, in common with many of my kind – at least those of us who have wised up – I don’t. However, I do actually “prefer” it because there’s a world of difference between writing and publishing and while writing online grants us the freedom to explore stories in a direction of our own choosing, publishing does not. Publishing just wants more of the same. Publishing wants what sells.
This is not to say I don’t still toy now and then with at least the idea of flirting with the printed press again, but the essentials there haven’t changed in forty years which means if long-form fiction’s your thing, you need an insider’s contacts to avoid the slush pile and to deliver your musings with an auspicious whack, directly to a commissioning editor’s desk. Without that advantage, you’re going nowhere my friend.
There’s self-publishing online for money of course, but for all its blather, writers should be wary of its over-hyped promise because this won’t make you rich and famous either. Kurt Vonnegut nailed it when he said the arts were no way to make a living, only to grow some soul. What does that mean? It means we have to buckle down and a get ourselves a proper job first. Anything will do, so long as it leaves us time and energy at the end of the day to write. The trouble is, being an amateur hack, we’re likely to be as unknown in our sixties as we were in our twenties. Is that a failure of ourselves as writers? Well, it depends how much you grow your soul in the mean time, and none of us are best placed to be the judge of that anyway.
I suspect it’s a journey we must all make as individuals, so nothing I say here is going to make sense to anyone just starting out, and they’ll still likely believe against the odds they can change the world with their story, if only the world would wise up and recognise their genius. But trust me, it wont.
It’s a funny old business, growing soul. I mean, if writing or any other form of art were truly integral to that process, one might think thrashing out the most perfect story or poem, then unceremoniously deleting it wouldn’t matter, that if anyone read it or not would be irrelevant, that growing one’s soul is a purely private matter, no audience required. Except to me it does seem important, this exchange from one mind to another, writer to reader, that unless we writers complete that particular end of the bargain, the muse or the genii or the daemons who gave us this stuff in the first place won’t be happy until they’ve goaded us into finding an audience for it. Or this may just be a sign of residual vanity in me, that forty years of writing has left my soul the same button-mushroom size it was when I was ten.
In the bad old days this primeval urge to find an audience would deliver us into the hands of the vanity press. You could tell them apart by the fact they accepted your manuscript in glowing terms, while the other lot simply returned it unread. Yes, the vanity press would butter you up no end, appeal to your – well – vanity, then print your novel and deliver you a crate of the things, leaving the rest to you, which is to say high and dry and probably skint. Beware, vanity is a terrible thing and can lead you into all kinds of trouble.
They’re still around, those shysters, moved mostly online now, offering also their worthless authoring services like reading and editing, all of which still leave the writer out of pocket and no nearer publication than when they started. So don’t be tempted, or at least if you are don’t be surprised when you get shafted.
I look to the online world then as a means of pacifying that particular whim of the muse who seems curiously untroubled by giving the work away. And it has to be said there’s something quietly subversive about it that I enjoy. Yes, you can charge for it on Amazon and Smashwords, but then the downloads shrivel to nothing, because everyone online is after free-stuff and the value of a work is, after all, in its scarcity, and regardless of the fact you spent a year writing it, your novel can be copied and pirated in a nanosecond, rendering it essentially worthless – at least in money terms – anyway.
The downside is that while the Internet has the advantage of a potentially global reach, for readers actually hitting upon one’s work it’s a bit like sitting on a needle in a haystack – an entirely chance and unlikely event. So, building even a humble readership can be rather a slow business. Why bother then?
Well, perhaps the truth is if we were wealthy enough we might spin our musings from the psychiatrist’s couch, whittle down to the nub of things that way, but instead we write for the mysterious “other”. The “other” understands us perfectly; they just never write back to say so, and that’s fine because if they did, we’d know it wasn’t them anyway.
Is that growing some soul? I don’t know, but I’m still writing, always looking for the next story, the next tumble down the wormholes of my dizzy head.
And that has to count for something.
Barely apropos, I read this interesting article about how it’s far easier for mathematicians to find a needle in a haystack than to find a haystack itself: https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-mathematicians-cant-find-the-hay-in-a-haystack-20180917/ … More apropos, I’ve found it does help to get a little feedback from some readers, like a bit of water for the garden, helping the soul to grow
This echoes my experience in the music business so closely. In the early nineties, I was in a band that almost got somewhere—we were one of the NME’s top tips for 1991 along with The Manic Street Preachers and Ocean Colour Scene. They did pretty well with their predictions that year, but we were the exception that proved the rule. The biggest highlight of our brief career was touring with Manchester’s New FADs, a great band that it was a real joy to watch every night, and a lovely bunch of people.
A year later we split up and New FADs brought out the album I was convinced would make them. It didn’t and a year later they’d split up too. The album contained a song called Kill My Instincts that hit the nail on the head about the industry:
“As you pull another teenage combo
In out of the limbo
You know how to kill my instincts
A week or two
And we’ll call you”
For me that seemed to make everything alright. It said, “it’s not you, it’s them”. It’s not important whether we “made it” or not, it’s that we did it. That’s what grows the soul. Staying true to that creative process and trying to push yourself.
Feedback from that other is important though. They do exist, it’s just reaching them that presents the challenge. At least with music, you have the opportunity to play live and get immediate feedback. For writers, it’s much harder, but not impossible. It would be nice to make money from it, but that’s not what grows the soul, it’s staying creative.
Very thought provoking post, Michael. I’m rarely this reflective at this time on a Monday morning, so you’ve reached me!
Thanks George,
I’m not at my most reflective on Mondays either – present in body only until at least lunch time. Of course I had to check out You Tube for The New FADS. I missed out a lot on the indy music scene back then – goodness knows what I was doing, writing my first novel I think. What a great sound. I seem to be more appreciative of that kind of music now than I was.
It must be the toughest road for a talented bunch of young lads, the gigs and the hoping for a break, easy to lose sight of what it’s about and you wonder how those few bands who do make it big and manage to stick around keep going without losing their souls.
Anyway, respect for “being there”. That’s really something.
All the best
Michael
Thank you, Michael. Glad I’ve managed to switch you on to New FADS. HUG (that was my band) were only together four years, but that still remains a really big part of my life. Not only for the experience, but the friendships. The band were and still are like family. If anything we might be even closer now. Sometimes there are richer rewards than making it.
Reblogged this on Reflections of the Schnark and commented:
This may be bigging myself up a little, I am at the start of the road that Michael and George have been on for a lot longer, but this idea of intellectual exchange is really buzzing me. I feel like I can be some one.
I have always felt that being perceived was an important part of being. I see myself as others see me, which has the sting that if I am not seen, I am nothing. That might be seen otherwise as boredom but what ever you call it, it’s hideous, and I’m happy now to find a way to express myself.