Well, I picked up the car yesterday after over a week in the workshop. The gearbox is still goosed and I’ll have to take the car back in to have it replaced when the new one arrives from Vauxhall. All of this is just a temporary fix then, but at least I’m rolling again. What seems to have been happening is the radiator was leaking water into the gearbox, which steamed off and turned the gearbox oil to brown slime. You’d no idea the car was losing water because there’s no temperature gauge to warn you and the first you know about it the thing’s boiling over – though I had the added excitement of a blown hose. I think Vauxhall have a recall on this one now so if you’ve got a new model Astra auto, like mine, I suggest you get it into your local dealer for a checkup. Anyway, the car looked mucky, bird pooped and sad when I picked it up, but I’ll cheer it up with a wash, a polish, and a run out to somewhere nice at the weekend.
I arrived early at the dealership and had to hang about for the place to open. Also hanging about was the driver of a massive car transporter – a smart, well groomed chap of late middle years, who came over to me for a chat. His job involved a weekly round of the North, picking up cars from Grimsby, then delivering them to various garages, then back down to Grimsby, for more cars, and another round of deliveries. We talked about sat navs and motorways and all sorts of things really. He was a skilful conversationalist, unlike yours truly, who’s a bit lost once he lifts his fingers from the keyboard. The guy was subtly testing my local knowledge and sucking out bits of it that might be useful to him – like what was down this road, and do you think I’ll get my rig down there? He had a light touch and it was a pleasure to talk with him – unlike the Taxi driver who drove me over, who didn’t say a word, drove aggressively, like he had the devil on his tail, and the car in front was just a figment of our imagination.
Like the Taxi driver, the transporter guy had a job to do and not much time to do it in, but he had such an easy going way about him I could imagine him slipping through all sorts of problems and coming out the other end still smiling, and still on time. It’s all a question of personality I suppose, but I think this business of our approach to life is important, and of the two characters I encountered this morning, I know whose version of the world I’d prefer living in.
Speaking of “approach”, you can see this in the speculative fiction genre I seem Hell bent on targeting again. I fired off that story at long last, but I’m not sure now it was a good idea. I’ve been perusing some of stuff in the mag’s archives and really, my stories don’t seem to fit at all. These other stories were far more gritty and edgy than mine. They also deal with themes that are frequently horrific to me, and depressing – like my bird pooped car. They take you places I’m not sure I want to go – which I guess is the mark of good fiction, but there seems to be no room for anything more optimistic any more. Look they’re saying, this is going to make you physically sick, but it’s how things are going to be for us in the future, so toughen up, because we’re all doomed, and the future is no place to be looking forward to at all. I noticed this same thing the last time I researched the genre, and it’s no different now. I wonder if I should really be calling my stuff speculative at all?
My characters are usually confused and possibly slightly mad (okay a bit like me). They see the world in an odd sort of way,(a bit like me) but they have a positive take on life.(most of the time, I hope). They’re driven by the promises of love, happiness or enlightenment. (okay, got me there too). They want to be happy, and they usually find happiness, though not in the place they originally thought they would. (Hmn) They have to change, be flexible in their thoughts, and bend with the wind. They don’t live in cities. They live in places where there’s green grass and trees, and open meadows you can wander through at your ease without fear of getting mugged by some muppet with a knife.
Conversely, much of the speculative genre consists of gritty urban decay, drug taking, deviant sex, muck, and cruelty to others, either criminal or state sanctioned – not the sort of stuff I’d be happy letting my mother or my kids read. Maybe it’s like that in parts our cities – I don’t know because I don’t spend that much time in them, but the impression I get from reading the press these days (and know this isn’t true) is you’re likely to have your tyres shot out for merely passing through.
I have tried to inject this kind of “attitude ” into my writing but I always end up feeling either ridiculous, or perverted because I simply don’t believe in it and I’m left wondering if I’m living on the same planet the authors for whom this kind of stuff comes most naturally. Are they all just so much younger than me? Admittedly, their work is in demand, so who’s right here? Or have we simply gone so far down the rocky road of rational ruination, there’s no longer any room for optimism, love or enlightenment?
I’ve often thought the difference between literary fiction and any old pap is that the “any old pap” story tends to have a happy ending, while the literary story will avoid it all costs, even if the result is incomprehensible and more like a blown raspberry to the reader, than a rounded piece of writing. Now, I’m hardly the best judge because I failed my O-Level English Lit. I hadn’t a clue what was required and I hadn’t a clue how the other kids knew what the answers were. I’d never heard of study guides, and realise now they were just copying what they’d been told to say about all this stuff, by the literary experts who’d put the guides together in the first place. Bathsheba Everdene (famous novel heroine) thought this because blah di blah di blah and these are the key quotes that prove it, right? Meanwhile I just read the stories, and the plays and the poems in isolation and thought to myself: “What?”
It seems I’m still doing it.
What’s all this building up to? Not sure yet – but I’ve often been struck by the fact that the leading establishment thinkers in the west, our philosophers, our writers, or whatever, seem pale and sickly from staring into the abyss. We look to them for advice, for explanation, and they just shake their heads like Corporal Frasier in an episode of Dad’s Army and tell us: “we’re all doooo-med.”
I’m reminded of Alfred Russel Wallace, the guy who, independently of Darwen, came up with the theory of evolution. Wallace was deeply disturbed by the implications of it, as many were, because it seemed to eliminate the spiritual dimension from life. Suddenly, the mystery of life was reduced to a blind mish mash, and these feelings of moral, intellectual and spiritual superiority possessed by mankind were basically delusions, or tricks of the mind which somehow merely conferred upon us an evolutionary advantage in some way that wasn’t – and still isn’t – clearly understood.
Wallace said that if we eliminated the spiritual dimension, if we concluded there was no actual point to existence, and if we continued developing society on that basis then we were sunk, because there was something in us that demanded we pay attention to the spiritual, the religious life, and we ignored it at our peril.
Carl Jung said pretty much the same thing. He called it the religious function. If you ignore it, he said, suppress it, denigrate it, or otherwise mess about with it, it’ll make you ill, as an individual, or collectively as a species. You’ll become depressed, pessimistic, irrational, riddled with psychoses, or just plain mad.
Wallace sought to redress the balance in his own life by looking into spiritualism – many of his contemporaries did the same. It seemed to offer tantalising proof of the continuation of some kind of existence after death, which suggested to him there must be something more to evolution that we’d yet to understand. Of course the establishment simply thought he’d lost it – there’s nothing like a whiff of spiritualism to get the rationalists sharpening their knives is there? Anyway, for all of that the ideas of spiritualism seem to have done little to substantially alter the way most of us actually see the world since Wallace’s day.
Admittedly I’m not that well up on spiritualism, because I’m too much of a scaredy cat to look more closely at it, but certain things like for example the Myers Cross Correspondences, the writings of Patience Worth, and the Scole incident are not so easy to explain away, yet we set them to one side in the hope that the dust of history alone will discredit them for us (it couldn’t have been true and anyway it was such a long time ago we’ve no way of reliably knowing for sure now, have we? So it’s best just to let it go, old chap). While I think part of us wants to believe in such things, another part of us does not and is perhaps (in part) genetically predisposed to reject them.
I suppose this is understandable, and necessary. If we all knew with absolute certainty that life went on after death, in whatever way – either some psychological continuation of existence on another plane, or perhaps another incarnation on this one, that the transition to it could be painlessly arranged and even pleasant, then I think a good many would be queuing up to give it a try. But that doesn’t sound like a good idea to me. In this way then, our rational thinking ensures a healthy circumspection, it keeps us focussed firmly in this life because, well, it might be the only one we’ve got and we shouldn’t be in too much of a hurry to want to leave it.
So, I picked up my car, had a chat with this guy, got thinking about our approach to life, which led me on to the doom and gloom in much of the speculative fiction I’ve been reading recently, and then somehow shunted myself into the buffers of spiritualism. But there’s a point, I think. It’s like what I was going on about earlier this week in my post on the Garden Buddha: it’s pretty much our lot in life to deal with its attendant suffering, but there’s no sense in making a virtue out of it, or making things seem worse than they really are. All right – we shouldn’t let go of our sense of critical reasoning, or we can end up believing in any old rubbish, and if the scientific evidence tells us something is the way it is, then we have to be respectful of that. However we shouldn’t hold on to our rational senses so tightly that we are no longer moved by the mystery of existence, or we’re going to end up believing in nothing at all but the sum total of three thousand years of western rationalist philosophy, which seems only to be telling us that you suffer and then you die.
And I really don’t believe that.
Do you?
So. Step back from the brink. Smile. Go take a walk in the countryside, far away from your city walls. Go and see what the world looks like from the top of a hill. Nurture love. Make love, dammit. Go find a beach, take off your shoes and socks and let the sea wash over your toes. Plant a tree. Hug a tree. Look up into the sky at night and let the stars amaze you.
In my stories I may occasionally point out what I see as the rocky road to rational ruination, but I won’t try to break your heart by leading you any further along it than I think we need to go, because it’s taking us in the wrong direction, and I have another destination in mind altogether.
Read Full Post »