(ruin: collective noun – a flock of geese, a bunch of grapes, a “ruin” of wind-generators)
I seem to be coming down ever more firmly on the side of those who are against wind generators, which are being sold to us as something of a panacea at the moment. The right-brain argument goes that if you’re against wind generators you’re against the planet. They’re a form of “green” energy, so you’re anti-green if you don’t like them. What I would say is that I don’t like them because they spoil the view, which sounds a bit weak I suppose, when the alternative is a coal fired power station belching out plumes of CO2 that’s going to ruin the planet. In my defence I can only argue that I place a very high value on the way the planet looks, and would sooner reduce my consumption of electricity and thereby obviate the need for these contraptions, than spoil the look of the planet, in order to save it.
Like anything else industrial and privately owned, power generation is about making money for shareholders, and it’s about squeezing the public until the pips squeak, and if anyone thinks that windmills, or any other form of privately owned eco-freindly energy is going to to reduce your power bills you’re sadly mistaken. The only way to do that is to stop burning it, and quite frankly, I don’t think the energy companies want you to do that, at least not until they’ve found a way of generating it for nothing while conversely charging you ten times more for it than they do at present.
But going back to the view, and its ruination by wind-farms:
Imagine a little old man, living in a quiet country cottage. He’s lived there all his life. It’s not a big place and he only has a small patch of land at the back, but it looks out over open farmland and he’s grown used to the simple beauty of it – the pastures, the trees, the creatures, and the changing patterns of nature though the seasons. The light pouring in from this pastoral scene fills his house and colours his life. Then, in his eightieth year, the farm goes bust and the land is sold to an insensitive bastard of a developer who decides to build a massive warehouse right up to the boundary line, dwarfing the old guy’s house and casting it in permanent shadow. When he looks out of his back door now, all he sees is a massive grey wall and it’s like his house has been moved overnight into the middle of the industrial sector of a city.
To the old guy, this is not merely an inconvenience, a minor loss of amenity, causing a dip in the monetary value of his property. It is a shattering of the psychical continuity of his life, and a brutal assault on his senses, as unforgivable as any mugging or robbing of his life’s savings.
Openness and beauty, uncluttered hills, green pastures, sparkling lakes and ponds, centuries old trees, the chatter of clean water running in our rivers and our streams, and the unobtrusive, unlittered paths that wend quietly among them are of inestimable value to human beings on account of their peculiar propeties that are capable of restoring a sense of well being into the hearts of anyone who cares to visit them. Like our planet they cannot be returned to us once they’re spoiled, and they tend to be spoiled when someone with an eye for a profit begins to weigh them up with the peculiar blind sight of the utilitarian economist. If no money can be made from beauty then an insensitive society will feel no loss at covering it with concrete, power-lines, or wind-generators. I can only trust that I do not live in that kind of society, but increasingly I’m beginning to wonder.
Over the last twenty years, China has spent its time powering up and becoming the all purpose manufactory of the world, exporting to us the goods those same utlitarian economists decided we could no longer afford to make for ourselves. But along with their computers and their clothes and their children’s toys and their fireworks, I’ve also partaken of the history of China’s pre-revolutionary culture and also some of its philosophical exports. In Daoism, for example, one of China’s major religious and philosopical traditions, there is a recognition of the power of nature to give expression to a formless and entirely intangible phenomenon called Dao.
Without Dao there is nothing. You can’t see it, touch it, smell it or sell it but you can feel it, and you feel it most strongly in unspoiled nature. Certain combinations of natural form give rise to a greater sense of Dao than others. You’ve all felt it. No matter how beautiful the country you walk through, there is always a special place that comes to mind. These things are subjective and reflective of something in ourselves as well, so they’ll be different for each of us, and often very subtle. It can be as trivial as the way a tree’s branches hang down over a stretch of shallow water, or it can be in the way the light hits a mountain ridge at a certain season of the year. It fills you up with something that makes life all the more worth while. It is one of those priceless and indefinable things that makes up your life’s reward. Yet many spend their lives in ignorance of it.
It’s Dao that tells us a natural forest of native hardwoods is beautiful and uplifting to walk though while a commercial monoculture of Sitka Spruce is butt ugly and depressing. It’s Dao that tells us a stream of water splashing over little stones and tumbling down in silver cascades is pleasant to sit beside on a summer’s day – Dao that tells us that to take that same stream and divert it through a concrete conduit – although it serves the same purpose of moving water from one place to the other – would be a stupid thing to do.
A dozen wind-generators sitting on a hilltop might generate enough power to light the homes of the little village sitting at the bottom, but it’s Dao that tells me I’d be better reading my book by the light of an oil lamp, and gazing out of my window by day on an uncluttered hilltop, than on a scene of utter ruination.